Rocher E, Chappard C, Jaffre C, Benhamou CL, Courteix D (2008) Bo

Rocher E, Chappard C, Jaffre C, Benhamou CL, Courteix D (2008) Bone mineral density in prepubertal obese and control children: relation to body weight, lean mass, and fat mass. J Bone Miner Metab 26:73–78PubMedCrossRef 29. El Hage R, Jacob C, Moussa E, Benhamou CL, Jaffre C (2009) Total body, lumbar spine and hip bone mineral density in overweight adolescent girls: decreased or increased? J Bone Miner Metab 27:629–633PubMedCrossRef 30. Ilich JZ, selleck chemical Skugor M, Selleckchem Galunisertib Hangartner T, An BS, Matkovic V (1998) Relation of nutrition, body composition

and physical activity to skeletal development: a cross-sectional study in preadolescent females. J Am Coll Nutr 17:136–147PubMed 31. Goulding A, Taylor RW, Grant AM, Murdoch L, Williams SM, Taylor BJ (2008) Relationship of total body fat mass to bone area in New Zealand five-year-olds. Calcif Tissue Int 82:293–299PubMedCrossRef 32. Clark EM, Ness AR, Tobias JH (2006) Adipose tissue stimulates bone growth in prepubertal children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:2534–2541PubMedCrossRef 33. Timpson NJ, Sayers A, Davey Smith G, Tobias JH (2009) How does body fat influence bone mass learn more in childhood? A Mendelian randomization approach. J Bone Miner Res 24:522–533PubMedCrossRef 34. Sayers A, Tobias JH (2010) Fat mass exerts a greater effect on cortical bone mass in girls than boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:699–706PubMedCrossRef

35. Ackerman A, Thornton JC, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr, Levetiracetam Horlick M (2006) Sex difference in the effect of puberty on the relationship between fat mass and bone mass in 926 healthy

subjects, 6–18 years old. Obesity (Silver Spring) 14:819–825CrossRef 36. Rubin C, Maisonet M, Kieszak S, Monteilh C, Holmes A, Flanders D, Heron J, Golding J, McGeehin M, Marcus M (2009) Timing of maturation and predictors of menarche in girls enrolled in a contemporary British cohort. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 23:492–504PubMedCrossRef”
“Introduction Adverse consequences of hyperkyphosis (excessive thoracic kyphosis) include physical functional limitations [1–4], injurious falls [5], back pain [6], respiratory compromise [7], restricted spinal motion [8], fractures [9, 10], and mortality [11–13]. However, a recent randomized, controlled trial found that hyperkyphosis was remediable, encouraging further study of its prevention and treatment [14]. Impediments to large-scale hyperkyphosis research are the difficulties inherent in obtaining the criterion standard measurement, the modified Cobb angle [15–19], including expense, limited portability of X-ray equipment, X-ray exposure, and the time necessary to procure and read the radiographic image. To facilitate hyperkyphosis research, investigators have developed inexpensive and X-ray-free kyphosis measures, such as the Debrunner kyphometer and the flexicurve ruler.

Comments are closed.