Plast Reconstr Surg 1996, 98:804–810 PubMedCrossRef 23 Sugarbake

Plast Reconstr Surg 1996, 98:804–810.PubMedCrossRef 23. Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R, et al.: Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004, 128:138–146.PubMedCrossRef Selleckchem Ipatasertib 24. Ouellet JF, Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Mack LA, Kirkpatrick AW: Bioprosthetic mesh use for the problematic thoracoabdominal wall: outcomes in relation to contamination and infection. Am J Surg 2012, 203:594–597.PubMedCrossRef Competing interests The Bard CollaMend® (Davol, Cranston, RI) mesh was purchased through the funds of the National Health System (Servizio Sanitario Nazionale). The authors have no conflict of interest and have the full control

of the study and production of the present report. Authors’ contribution FC, ML, LA participated in study design, literature search, data collection, manuscript writing, patient management and data analysis, RM, DP, SM, LC e PB participated in data interpretation, Quizartinib manufacturer preparation of the figures and patient learn more management. All authors read and approved the final

manuscript.”
“Front matter This is a proof-of-concept investigation using the swine model of grade V exsanguinating liver trauma. The aim of the investigation was to determine if the internal application of a modified vacuum-assisted closure device to the injured liver could control hemorrhage. Key points High grade, exsanguinating liver injury requires rapid control. Application of a negative pressure device to exsanguinating liver injury is a variant of “”packing”" that may offer several advantages. In this proof-of-concept investigation using an animal model of liver trauma, application of a negative pressure device rapidly controlled hemorrhage. Introduction The liver is the most commonly injured intraperitoneal organ [1]. Treatment of liver Tenofovir molecular weight trauma has evolved significantly over the past thirty years and is now often managed non-operatively [2, 3]. Operative management, almost exclusively reserved for Grade IV and V injuries, has included such procedures as selective hepatic artery ligation, [4, 5] omental packing, anatomic and non-anatomic

hepatic resection and deep liver suturing, some of which remain controversial [1, 3–6]. Short of formal resection, adequate debridement of non-viable hepatic parenchyma is generally advocated and performed, since it is thought to be vital in minimizing septic complications [1]. Liver transplantation for trauma has been described [7], but largely abandoned and limited only to a few extraordinary cases, guided more by conjecture and circumstance than by evidence. Perihepatic packing has been utilized to treat liver injury since the Second World War. Success in civilian trauma has revitalized this modality as a temporizing measure to control hemorrhage, particularly in cases complicated by the deadly triad of hypothermia, hypocoagulability and acidosis [8–11].

Comments are closed.