Pretreatment of cells with either MAL3-101 or HSP70 siRNA inhibited translocation of MARCKS. These results provide evidence of a role for HSP70 in mediating mucin secretion via interactions with MARCKS and that these interactions are critical for the cytoplasmic translocation of MARCKS upon its phosphorylation.”
“Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is a member of the interferon regulatory factor family of transcription factors and has been shown to have critical functions at several stages of B-cell development. Genome-wide association study identified a polymorphism in the 3′ untranslated

region of IRF4 as a chronic lymphocytic leukemia risk locus. In this study, Combretastatin A4 mw we report a recurrent heterozygous somatic mutation in the DNA-binding domain of IRF4 detected in 7 of 457 chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients (1.5%). Patients with IRF4 mutation have a good prognosis, and 4 of 6 have a trisomy 12. We also found that IRF4 mRNA expression is higher in the patients with the mutation. (Blood. 2011; 118(10): 2827-2829)”
“In earlier studies, we had suggested that the fasting signal induces TR4 orphan nuclear receptor expression in vivo. The detailed mechanism(s), however, remain unclear. In this study, we found that cAMP/PKA, the mediator of fasting and glucagon signals, could induce TR4 gene expression that in turn modulates Selleck ACY-1215 gluconeogenesis. Mechanistic dissection by in

vitro studies in hepatocytes demonstrated that cAMP/PKA might trigger C/EBP alpha and beta binding to the selective cAMP response element, which is located at the TR4 promoter, selleck chemicals llc thus inducing TR4 transcription. We also demonstrated that the binding activity of C/EBPs to the TR4 promoter is increased in response to cAMP treatment.

Together, our data identified a new signaling pathway from the fasting signal -> cAMP/PKA -> C/EBP alpha and beta -> TR4 -> gluconeogenesis in hepatocytes; and suggested that TR4 could be an important regulator to control glucose homeostasis. The identification of activator(s)/inhibitor(s) or ligand(s) of TR4 may provide us an alternative way to control gluconeogenesis.”
“Recent advances in mitochondrial imaging have revealed that in many cells mitochondria can be highly dynamic. They can undergo fission/fusion processes modulated by various mitochondria-associated proteins and also by conformational transitions in the inner mitochondrial membrane. Moreover, precise mitochondrial distribution can be achieved by their movement along the cytoskeleton, recruiting various connector and motor proteins. Such movement is evident in various cell types ranging from yeast to mammalian cells and serves to direct mitochondria to cellular regions of high ATP demand or to transport mitochondria destined for elimination. Existing data also demonstrate that many aspects of mitochondrial dynamics, morphology, regulation and intracellular organization can be cell type-/tissue-specific.