Multi institutional trials using IMRT

have also been conducted. A trial from the Mayo Clinic, University of California at San Diego, Emory University, HA-1077 cost Loyola University, and the University of Chicago was conducted to determine the efficacy of IMRT in treating anal cancer. 53 patients were analyzed, 8/53 were HIV+ (58). Treatment efficacy was similar to historical controls in that overall survival and Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical colostomy free survival was in the 80% range (58). Median follow up time is only slightly over one year. In this study all HIV+ patients had a complete response. IMRT did help minimize GI toxicity (15% grade 3) however they still reported high rates of dermatologic (38%) and hematologic toxicity (34%). 41.5% of patients had to take treatment break (58). This trial recently reported the first volumetric study following IMRT implementation. There results suggest if the volume of small bowel receiving 30 Gy is less than 450cc then there is a 3 fold reduction in toxicity. IMRT had no effect Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical on limiting bone marrow toxicity as 58% of patients had grade 3-4 leukopenia (59). This past year, data from a RTOG multiinstitutional

phase II trial analyzing IMRT in the treatment of anal cancer were published in abstract form (60). Hong et al (2010) observed Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical that IMRT was feasible and that IMRT decreased skin toxicity as well as high grade GI/GU toxicities more than 15% as compared to historic controls from the RTOG 9811 paper describing the standard of care for anal cancer

(33),(60). IMRT Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical appears to be promising in reducing acute toxicities. Reducing acute toxicity and treatment breaks should improve outcomes. These benefits may be most important in the patient population most susceptible to acute toxicities. Long term follow up is needed to ensure that treatment efficacy is not compromised. Anal cancer follow-up The Inhibitors,research,lifescience,medical randomized control trials have demonstrated that concurrent chemoradiation (5FU/MMC) is efficacious in curing disease and preventing need for colostomy approximately 60-80% of the time (27)-(30). Preventing a colostomy is important in preserving a patient’s quality of life. The studies from the RTOG and EORTC have shown that time to colostomy and rate of colostomy is significantly improved with the use of concurrent chemoradiation, specifically 5FU/MMC +RT compared to RT alone or 5FU/cisplatin + RT. Close follow-up is needed to determine if patients are responding effectively to definitive unless chemoradiation. Currently, the National Cancer Comprehensive Network (NCCN) guidelines state that patients should have a digital rectal exam 8-12 weeks after chemoradiation to determine response to treatment (61). If there is question of disease progression or no response, then a clinical biopsy is warranted. If biopsy is positive, the NCCN still recommends waiting an additional 4 weeks to assess response to chemoradiation.