Mangotoxin production was evaluated using PMS minimal medium supplemented or not with ornithine. The results are indicated as follows: – absence of inhibition halo, + presence of inhibition halo, -* slight toxicity which was not click here reverted by addition of ornithine. Toxic activity reverted in presence of ornithine denotes the production of mangotoxin. In order to know if the virulence of the derivative mutants mboA- and mgoA was reduced in comparison with the wild type strain, detached tomato leaflets were artificially inoculated. FLT3 inhibitor Artificial inoculation experiments using detached tomato leaflets [4] showed that bacterial growth inside

the tomato leaflets of the mboA – and ΔmgoA mutants as well as their complemented derivatives followed similar dynamics (Additional

file 3: Figure S2A). When inoculations were performed, development of necrotic lesions was observed on the leaf. Disease severity, represented by the necrotic area, showed that BIX 1294 clinical trial both mangotoxin defective mutants were less virulent than the wild type UMAF0158 (Additional file 3: Figure S2B and S2C). When derivative strains were complemented with the mboA and mgoA genes disease severity increased but complementation did not fully restore virulence to wild type level (Additional file 3: Figure S2B and S2C). Mangotoxin production and transcriptional regulation in the gacA and mgoA mutant To study the role of mgoA and gacA in mangotoxin biosynthesis, transcription of the mboACE and mgoBA genes was analyzed for the wild type strain, and for the mgoA and gacA derivative mutants. Time course experiments showed that the mbo genes in the wild type are expressed at the highest level after 12 to 24 h (Additional file 4: Figure S3). Therefore all comparisons between wild type and mutants were performed

at 18 h of growth. Transcript levels of the mboACE genes after 18 h of growth were significantly lower in the gacA and the mgoA mutants than in the wild type (Figure 2A). Also the transcript levels of mgoB and mgoA were significantly lower in the gacA mutant (Figure 2B). The mgoA mutation did not affect transcription of gacS/gacA (data not shown). Also mboA, mboC, or mboE mutations did not significantly affect transcription of gacS/gacA or mgoA (data not shown). These results indicate that the GacS/GacA Resveratrol two-component regulatory system affects transcription of both the mbo and mgo genes and that the product of the mgo operon influences transcription of the mbo genes. To further study if the GacS/GacA two-component regulatory system could regulate the mgo and mbo genes via RNA repressor binding proteins [49–51], the upstream regions of the mgo and mbo genes were inspected for the presence of the described consensus motif (5′-CANGGANG-3′) previously described in P. protegens CHAO [49]. This motif allows the binding of the repressor to the RNA, and these repressor proteins can be removed by Gac/Rsm.