) Fr. (1838), = Agaricus pustulatus Pers. (1801) : Fr., [Bataille’s name is automatically typified by the type species epithet upon which the taxon name was based, thus type RG7112 molecular weight is NOT Hygrophorus agathosmus (Fr. : Fr.) Fr., as in Singer (1951, 1986) and Candusso
(1997), Art. 22.6]. Basionym: Hygrophorus [unranked] Tephroleuci Bataille, Mém. Soc. émul. Doubs, sér. 8 4: 164 (1910). Pileus viscid, white or gray, cinereous, bistre or grayish-brown; lamellae distant, subdecurrent, white; stipe usually dry or subviscid, white, basally with grayish tinges, sometimes with dark grayish brown fibrils or granules from veil remnants; often with a distinct odor. Phylogenetic support Subsect. Tephroleuci is a monophyletic group with low MLBS support in our Supermatrix analysis (55 %), a clade lacking significant support in our ITS analysis (Online Resource 9) but is polyphyletic in our ITS-LSU analysis (Fig. 6). In a four-gene analysis presented by Larsson (2010, unselleck chemicals published data), the subsect. Tephroleuci clade, comprising H. agathosmus, H. pustulatus and H. hyacinthinus, has 100 % MP BS support. Species included Type species:
Hygrophorus NVP-BSK805 nmr pustulatus = H. tephroleucus. Hygrophorus agathosmus (Fr.) Fr., H. agathosmus f. albus Candusso, H. hyacinthinus Quél. and H. odoratus A.H. Sm. & Hesler are included based on molecular phylogenies and morphology. Comments Singer (1951) assumed Bataille’s (1910) unranked name Tephroleuci was a designated subsection. Thus Singer (1951) inadvertently published the combination Hygrophorus subsect. Tephroleuci (Bataille) Singer. Bataille’s groups were named for type species, so the type of Tephroleuci Bataille is Hygrophorus tephroleucus (Art. 22.6), not H. agathosmus as stated by Singer (1951, 1986) and Candusso (1997). Fries (1821) and Bataille recognized both H. tephrolucus and H. pustulatus (Pers.) Fr., though Konrad (1936) and Konrad and Maublanc (1937) apparently considered them conspecific and selected H. pustulatus over the competing name H. tephroleucus; H. pustulatus is the name in current use. The clade corresponding Guanylate cyclase 2C to subsect. Tephroleuci is concordant with Bataille’s (1910) with exclusion
of H. fuscoalbus Lasch., H. lividoalbus Fr., H. lucandi Gill., and H. marzuolus Fr. The composition of Tephroleuci in Singer (1986), Candusso (1997) and Kovalenko (1989, 1999) is only partly concordant with our phylogenies because they included species from subg. Camarophyllus (i.e., H. camarophyllus, H. calophyllus, and H. atramentosus). Bon (1990) included H. agathosmus and H. odoratus, which are all in the Tephroleuci clade, but he placed the type species, H. pustulatus (= H. tephroleucus), in sect. Hygrophorus subsect. Fuscocinerei (Fr.) Bon [illeg.], while including H. mesotephrus. from subsect. Olivaceoumbrini. Hygrophorus [subgen. Colorati ] sect. Pudorini (Bataille) Konrad & Maubl., Sel. Fung. 6: 427 (1937). Type species Hygrophorus pudorinus (Fr.), Fr. Anteckn. Sver. Ätl. Svamp.