Figure 4 Verification of the expression of small RNA RyhB by RT-PCR. L: DNA ladder; 1. PCR amplification of S. oneidensis

RNA without reverse transcription; 2. PCR amplification of sample after reverse transcription of RNA. The presence of the ~119 bp PCR product validates the expression of RyhB RNA. 3 and 4: PCR on two control intergenic regions (Chr. 367734-367820 and 796545-796665). The absence of PCR products indicates that genomic DNA has been completely removed from the RNA templates used for RT-PCR. To determine the transcriptional boundaries of FRAX597 molecular weight the RyhB transcript, 5′- and 3′-RACE experiments were carried out on the same sample used for RT-PCR, identifying a 168-nt transcript between nucleotides 4920234-4920401 of the S. oneidensis genome [25]. This transcript is longer than the 90-nt E. coli RyhB [19], but shorter Anlotinib order than the 215-nt V. cholerae RyhB [22, 23]. A “”Fur box”", matching 15 of the 19-base consensus sequence (GATAATGATAATCATTATC) [26], was predicted at positions -26 to -44 upstream of this gene (Figure 3B). Together,

these results support the existence of a ryhB gene in S. oneidensis. ryhB genes were subsequently identified in eleven other sequenced Shewanella species by BLASTN using the S. oneidensis ryhB sequence as the query. Extensive sequence conservation was observed (Figure 3B), including the “”core”" buy NCT-501 region identified as homologous with the enterobacterial ryhB. Two copies of ryhB were detected in the draft genome sequence of S. amazonensis, in a tandem arrangement next similar to that observed for the P. aeruginosa ryhB [27]. The putative “”Fur box”" was also detected upstream of all of the ryhB homologs, suggesting that regulation of RyhB by Fur is a common feature among the Shewanella species. Over-expression of RyhB has no impact on the expression of TCA cycle genes

In E. coli, RyhB is highly up-regulated in a fur mutant, which in turn inhibits the expression of AcnA and SdhABCD enzymes and thus the TCA cycle. Since the expression of AcnA and SdhA remained unchanged in the S. oneidensis fur mutant, two possibilities exist as either RyhB is not regulated by Fur or that acnA and sdhA expression is independent of RyhB. To test the possibility that RyhB is not regulated by Fur, quantitative RT-PCR was performed to examine RyhB expression. As shown in Table 1, RyhB was induced 20-fold in the fur mutant. When the fur deletion was complemented by exogenous expression of Fur on the expression vector pBBR1MCS5-1, the RhyB induction was abolished (Table 1). In addition, regulation of RyhB by Fur was also supported by the identification of a “”Fur box”" upstream of RyhB (Figure 3B). To test the possibility that the expression of acnA and sdhA is independent of RyhB, S. oneidensis was transformed with a RyhB expression plasmid and quantitative RT-PCR performed. RyhB was 60-fold over-expressed relative to endogenous levels in MR-1 and the fur mutant (Table 1).