All observations were completed in the rehabilitation gymnasium with therapy staff present. The exercise observed was semi-supervised meaning therapists may sometimes provide feedback and check on progress including current participant exercise tally. No independent

exercise, eg, exercise that occurred outside the therapy setting, was observed. However, due to the nature of the gymnasium environment and the fact that participants were exercising alone but in the presence of others, it is possible that the results may be extrapolated to home/room based programs. Another limitation of the study is the low power to detect factors that influence the accuracy of exercise repetition counting. We did not find strong correlations between accuracy of exercise repetition counting and cognition, age, or disability level. Future research SAHA HDAC with a larger sample could further investigate ABT 888 predictors of accurate exercise repetition counting. In conclusion, this study indicates that therapist-identified rehabilitation participants are able to count their repetitions of exercise accurately. This method can be used clinically or in future research. Ethics: The Human Research Ethics Committee (Western Zone) of the Sydney South West Area Health Service approved this study on the 13th August

2008. Project number QA2008/049. All patients consent to the counting and documenting of exercise repetitions as part of their usual care on the rehabilitation units. Competing interests: Nil. Support: This study was supported by an infrastructure grant (number 07-08/007) from the Ingham Health Research Institute. Acknowledgements: Dharani Khandasamy assisted

with completing observations and data entry. to Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital physiotherapy staff and students assisted with observations including significant contributions from Simone Dorsch, Susan Mayo, Lily Jian, James Ruddell, and Dimyana Tanyous. “
“Summary of: Allen KD et al (2010) Telephone-based self-management of osteoarthritis: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 153: 570-579. [Prepared by Kåre Birger Hagen and Margreth Grotle, CAPs Editors.] Question: What are the comparative effects of telephone-based self-management support, health education materials (attention control), or usual care for primary care patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis (OA)? Design: A randomised clinical trial with equal assignment to three intervention groups. Setting: Primary care clinic, USA. Participants: Men and women with a physician diagnosis of hip or knee osteoarthritis, and persistent, current symptoms. Exclusion criteria included other rheumatologic conditions, psychoses, dementia, or being on a waiting list for arthroplasty. Randomisation of 523 participants allocated 174 to self-management, 175 to health education, and 174 to usual care.