70421 465.45316 0.012 0.9902 RL_rms 0.02557 0.03153 0.811 0.4175 Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Fig. 2 shows the partial effect of noise, given mean values of all other terms in Model 1. Given no additional information, and ignoring all other sources of uncertainty, the best this website point estimate suggests that 50% of killer whales showed a response ⩾2

on the Southall severity scale at received levels of approximately 130 dB re 1 μPa rms. The point at which half of whales showed a response ⩾3 on the Southall severity scale is likely to occur beyond the range of received levels observed in the study, i.e., >150 dB re 1 μPa rms. We do not use Model 2 or Model 3 for prediction, because the confidence intervals on RL_rms (when severity score 3 is used as the cutoff indicating a response) spanned

the entire range from 0 to 1. Northern resident killer whales showed moderate (severity score 2–4) responses to the presence of the large ships that use Johnstone Strait in summer months, but behavioral responses were best explained by combinations of time (Year and Month), age of the animal, number of ships (CAR, COL and TUG) and the broadband noise level received by the whale (RL_rms) (Fig. 2). Evaluating the effects of ship traffic on killer whale behavior is overwhelmingly influenced by a somewhat subjective and seemingly arbitrary decision about the severity score that one uses to indicate a response. Using a cutoff of ⩾2 on the Southall severity scale, we find that whales had selleck chemicals a 50% chance of responding to ship noise at broadband (10 Hz–50 kHz) received levels of ∼130 dB re 1 μPa root-mean-square (rms), but there is large uncertainty around that estimate (Fig.

2). Using a cutoff of ⩾3 on the Southall severity scale, we suspect that the point at which whales have 50% probability of responding to ship noise occurs beyond the range of received levels observed in our study: i.e., >150 dB re 1 μPa rms. Our models have very poor explanatory power for predicting more severe responses than those that would score a 2 on the Southall scale, because the range of traffic observed in our study never resulted in received Histone demethylase levels higher than 150 dB, and because very few of the natural experiments we observed resulted in more severe (⩾4) behavioral responses (Appendix 2). More information is needed at both high and low received levels before one would have confidence in the shape of the dose–response curve when a threshold is set at ⩾3 on the Southall scale. These rough estimates of sensitivity are not unexpected, given results from control-exposure studies showing subtle responses of killer whales to small vessels at received levels of 109–116 dB re 1 μPa rms (Williams et al., 2002a). Our analyses illustrate the need for a discussion about the point at which a behavioral response becomes sufficiently severe to be of conservation concern.