6 In order to prevent CKD and improve prognosis, two CKD-related programs have been initiated in Taiwan which were the CKD care program launched by the Bureau of Health Promotion in 2002 and the diabetic share care program initiated by the Bureau of National Health Insurance in 2001. Until 2007, there was a total of 83 institutes participating in the CKD care program AT9283 purchase in Taiwan. In order to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the CKD care program, a pilot study was initiated in two medical university-affiliated hospitals in southern Taiwan. The study was designed to evaluate cost-effectiveness of the CKD care program

and compare health-care cost within haemodialysis (HD) patients receiving a CKD care program and usual care. The results showed that, compared with patients receiving usual care, patients receiving a CKD care program had lower cost of both initiation HD and total health care. Furthermore,

the CKD care program could lower vascular access rate and hospitalization rate in the period of HD initiation. In short, approximately $US 1200/case could be saved during the peri-HD initiation period because of higher vascular access construction rate and lower hospitalization in the HD initiation. This pilot study showed that the integrated pre-ESRD care was important for beta-catenin inhibitor people with advanced CKD stages. Because the prevalence of diabetic nephropathy in Taiwan is high and controlling HbA1c in those patients is still not satisfactory,23 a diabetic share care program has been initiated since 2001 in Taiwan. In order to evaluate impact of educational intervention on diabetic control, a program entitled Diabetic Management Through an Integrated Delivery System (DMIDS) was performed during 2003–2008. The study compared the data between diabetic patients managed by health educators (intervention group) and original physicians (control group). The results demonstrated that a diabetic shared care program was cost-effective to prevent Org 27569 nephropathy, especially in patients with HbA1c of more than 10% (Fig. 2), and those receiving

educational intervention and case management of more than 4 years (Figs 3,4). The two CKD programs were effective in reducing ESRD burden in Taiwan because integrated pre-ESRD care was important for patients with CKD stage 4 and stage 5 while the diabetic shared care program was cost-effective to prevent nephropathy to patients with diabetic mellitus. Furthermore, a diabetic shared care program was most effective in patients with HbA1c of more than 10%. For the general population, case finding and increasing awareness for people with proteinuria and stage 3a could facilitate momentum for the national CKD prevention policy.24 In 2005, Kidney Health Australia convened the National CKD Summit.