3, d.f.=2, P<0.001). Livestock was part of the diet in all areas of the protected area: 38% of kills in NP (n=46), 50% of kills in Gir West (n=170) and 76%

of kills in peripheral areas (n=42). Consumption of wild and domestic prey varied between seasons (χ2=22.3, d.f.=2, P<0.0001) with a greater proportion of wild prey killed during summer months (Fig. 2). Three hundred and ten lion scats were analysed and 12 prey species were identified. Two hundred and ninety-five (95.2%) scats had a single prey item while 15 (4.8%) scats had two prey species. Frequency of prey occurrence were: chital 32%, sambar 26%, wild pig 10%, buffalo 11%, nilgai 9%, cattle 8% langur 2% and minor prey 2% including peafowl, porcupine, an unidentified bird species and camel (Table 1). Remains of claws of felid cubs were found in two scats but we PLX3397 datasheet were unclear as to whether they belonged to lion or leopard claws. Diet did not differ among management zones nor among seasons. Frequency of occurrence of prey in scats revealed that livestock occurred Navitoclax order in only 20% of the scats and wild prey occurred in 80% of the scats (Table 1). Chital and sambar contributed up to 58% of the lion’s diet (Table 1). Mean (±sd) feeding interval of 0.26 (0.055) kills per day translated to one kill every

medchemexpress 3.9 that is, 4 days. Eighty per cent of the prey consumed were adults constituted by chital (three), sambar (two), cattle (two) and buffalo (three). Fifty per cent of kills occurred between 16:30 and 20:00 h. Fifty one per cent of 3896 buffaloes and 43% of 847 cattle were adults (Fig. 4). Of the total annual livestock mortality, 60% (n=361) was due to lion predation and the rest due to disease and old age. Adults formed 49% (n=102) of buffalos and 69% (n=89) of cattle lost due to predation. Most of lion attacks (34%) on livestock occurred between 16:00 and 20:00 h (Fig.

3). The model accurately predicted the observed number of kills for the period 2002–2006 (G=11.4, d.f.=2, P=0.05) (Table 3). The success of Gir Lion Project was reflected in recovery of native vegetation as well as increase in wild ungulate and lion populations (Table 2; Khan et al., 1996). This success contributed to a dramatic change in the lion’s diet (Table 2; Chellam, 1993). In the past, livestock formed 75% of the lion’s diet (Joslin, 1973). However, during the subsequent period 52% (in early 1980s) and 75% (in the late 1980s) of prey consumed were wild prey (Sinha, 1987; Chellam, 1993). Similar ecosystem revival and management interventions need to now extend beyond protected area boundary to ensure conservation of lions in the long term in the entire landscape.