, 2004; Wang et al., 2007; Shen et al., 2009). However, the magnitude of the antigen-specific titers was not enhanced by PA co-delivered with the LFn fusions. This may reflect a low extracellular concentration/dose following expression that may limit the potential of the LFn fusions to come in contact with and bind to PA. Previous reports demonstrating an
additive immune response with PA and LFn used recombinant protein (Ballard et al., 1996; Lu et al., 2000) or targeted endogenously expressed PA and LFn from DNA vaccines to intracellular compartments (Price et al., 2001). In general, the antibody responses to the quadra-valent cocktail were consistent with the single antigen or Selleck Barasertib fusion formula; however, the anti-F1 response was significantly reduced (P = 0.05). TSA HDAC datasheet This may reflect competition between the endogenously produced fusion proteins for the same binding site on PA following expression and cellular binding. Twenty-one days after the final immunization, the mice were aerosol challenged with either 2.75 × 104 B. anthracis STI (10 LD50) spores per mouse or 1 × 105 CFU of Y. pestis
GB (10 LD50) per mouse using a Collison spray conditioned in a modified Henderson aerosol apparatus (Williamson et al., 2000). Significance between groups was determined by log rank tests in conjunction with the Bonferroni multiple comparison method where P < 0.02 was defined as significant. The inhaled anthrax dose defeated 80% of the sham-vaccinated (pDNAVACCultra2 either empty) mice, with a mean time to death (MTD) of 5 days. Groups receiving the PA and/or LFn expressing constructs were completely protected (100%, P < 0.02; Fig. 2a),
which is consistent with previous reports (Price et al., 2001; Hermanson et al., 2004; Livingston et al., 2010) and lends credence to the inclusion of nontoxic regions of LF in future anthrax vaccines (Baillie et al., 2010). The plague challenge was also lethal in the sham and phPA-vaccinated mice, resulting in a MTD of 3 days (Fig. 2b). Immunizations with phV-LFn or phLFn-F1 prolonged the MTD by 1 day relative to the sham (P < 0.02) but were still weakly protective against Y. pestis despite the relatively high antibody titers elicited by these fusions (Fig. 1c and d). In contrast, the protective efficacy of the phV-LFn construct was enhanced following co-immunization with phPA (83% survival). Immunization with all three constructs was also modestly protective against plague (66%). The mechanism behind this enhancement remains unclear; as previously noted, the antibody titers to the fusions were not synergistically increased in the presence of phPA. It is feasible that the CpG motifs within the plasmid backbone provided additional, nonspecific immune-stimulation (Williamson et al.