1). Creeks, streams and rivers were defined by their progressively higher order, and this classification was confirmed by testing if the classified stretches had significantly different river bed width. Since there was a clear significant difference in river bed width between creeks, streams and rivers, the distinction was considered reliable. selleck chemicals I derived five land-cover classes from the 1990 CORINE land-cover data (derived from classification of Landsat TM 30m resolution multispectral imagery) within a 1.5 km wide buffer of the waterway. The classes are: extensive agriculture (cereal plantations) (58%), cork oak woodland
(23%), holm oak woodland (6%), intensive agriculture (e.g., tomato, corn; 1%), and other (including Eucalyptus spp. and Pinus spp. plantations, urban areas, etc.; 12%). I used a digital data layer of watercourses in the study area overlain on the land-cover data to identify
all possible 2 km stretches dominated by a single land-cover type within the waterway buffers. Seventy-two sampling sites were randomly selected from this layer and screened for site accessibility. Two river transects surrounded by holm oak woodlands were inaccessible, resulting in a final sample of 70 transects. Field data collection I visited all sites once for plant identification between December 2003 to February 2004, and revisited each transect between June to September 2004 to assess any change in environmental context variables Selleck Foretinib (see below). The two seasons represent the variability of surface water in the watercourses, a key factor affecting plant establishment
and growth. Each Fludarabine 2 km transect was subdivided into 200 m segments, in which plant species presence was recorded. This distance was selected as subsamples because it matches the minimum resolvable unit in the land cover map (approximately 200 m2), and is comparable to similar surveys along riparian systems in the Iberian Peninsula (Aguiar and Ferreira 2005). Each waterway was surveyed using a transect parallel to the right waterway margin, which I walked while recording the presence or absence of every woody plant species within 5 m of the bank. All plant species were identified in the field, and samples of unknown species were collected and identified in the laboratory. The identification was resolved to the finest taxonomic status possible, with all specimens categorized at genus or species levels, especially in the case of the willow, moor and heath species, which lacked diagnostic features during the sampling months. Herbaceous species were excluded from the analysis because of the lack of consistently identifiable features (due to either phenology or herbivory).