The antimicrobial activity predictions were almost all positive,

The antimicrobial activity predictions were almost all positive, except in the case of EEE61250 (O. sativa), only negatively predicted by CAMP discriminant analysis. These predictions show that overall the properties of these sequences are similar to those from well-known antimicrobial peptides, such as hydrophobicity, net charge and secondary structure [46] and [57]. Loose et al. [38] proposed that AMPs work as a formal language, analogous to a grammatical structure composed of several rules (patterns and motifs) and a vocabulary (amino acids). In this view, the positive predictions are probably due to the grammatical structure of chitin-binding motif, present in all putative mature

sequences here reported. Other evidence of their biological activities was drawn from molecular models in complex to (GlcNAc)3 (Fig. 2) in addition to the molecular dynamics simulations. The proposed mechanism of action of GSK1210151A chemical structure fungicidal activity

in hevein-like peptides is related to the inhibition of cell wall elongation. The molecular dynamics show that the four hevein-like peptides here reported can bind to (GlcNAc)3 (Fig. S1). Among the sequences here reported, the sequence EEE61250 (O. sativa) seems to have the strongest fungicidal activity against chitin-containing fungi. The molecular model indicates that it interacts with chitin through five amino acid residues making six hydrogen bonds ( Fig. 2B). Besides, this sequence has aromatic residues identical to Pn-AMP2 [33], one of the strongest hevein-like Selleckchem BGB324 peptides already reported, which requires concentrations of 0.6–75 μg ml−1 for 50% of inhibition of fungal growth. Following the same reasoning, the activity of CBI18789 (V. vinifera) would be similar to EAFP2 [24], since their aromatic residues are identical. And for XP_002973523 (S. moellendorffii), the activity would be similar to Ac-AMP2 [9]. Nonetheless, for the peptide XP_001804616 Paclitaxel in vitro (P. nodorum), there

are no peptides with identical active residues. Otherwise, this peptide can also make four hydrogen bonds ( Fig. 2D). Moreover its hydrophobic interactions are reduced, since it lacks an aromatic residue. Taking into account the electrostatic surface, all peptides might interact with anionic membranes from chitin-free fungi and/or bacteria, since they have an amphipathic electrostatic surface ( Fig. 6). However, despite these indications, only in vitro tests can reveal their actual activities. In fact, the most intriguing sequence is XP_001804616 (P. nodorum). Although the hevein domain was previously identified in the chimerolectin CPB1 from M. grisea and also the fact that this domain appears in other chimerolectins in databases [29], XP_001804616 is the first report of a fungal hevein-like peptide, a merolectin. This peptide has two notorious differences when compared with plant hevein-like peptides.

Comments are closed.