[53, 54] It is interesting to note that the average murine pMHCI–CD8 interaction is substantially stronger (KD = 49–69 μm) (Table 1b,c) than the equivalent human interaction (KD = 145 μm) (Table 1a) [15] but does not result

in non-cognate CD8+ T-cell activation. Despite differences in TCR and CD8 binding (the average murine TCR–pMHCI and pMHCI–CD8 binding affinities are KD = 3·3 μm[17, 55-59] and KD = 59 μm, respectively, compared with the average human TCR–pMHCI and pMHCI–CD8 binding affinities of KD = 8·7 μm[45, 59-65] KD = 145 μm did, respectively[37, https://www.selleckchem.com/products/Nolvadex.html 45, 66]) the ratio of TCR and CD8 binding affinity is maintained between the two species (murine = 1 : 17, human = 1 : 18), so that the TCR binds with around 17–18 times stronger affinity than CD8. Therefore, the relationship between the binding affinity of the CD8 co-receptor compared with the TCR could represent a fundamental mechanism by which T cells maintain peptide antigen specificity through the TCR while retaining the required level of antigen sensitivity via CD8. Thus, pMHCI–CD8 interactions may have evolved in a highly constrained manner dictated by the need to balance high levels of T-cell cross-reactivity with non-specific T-cell activation, of which the latter could instigate auto-immunity. It

should also be noted that the ratio of TCR : CD8 binding affinity may be different in the thymus because positively selecting pMHC ligands have been shown to have a very weak binding affinity for cognate TCRs.[55, 67] Hence, CD8 has been implicated as an important player BGB324 mouse during thymic selection of immature thymocytes.[19] Although the weak binding affinity of the pMHCI–CD8 interaction excludes the possibility that CD8 plays a major role during T-cell/target cell adhesion, experiments using mutated pMHCI tetramers with altered CD8 binding properties have shown that CD8 can learn more profoundly affect TCR–pMHCI avidity.[11, 23, 53, 68] Accordingly, mutations in the α3 domain of HLA-A*0201 (D227K/T228A) that abolish CD8 binding (CD8-null) decreased both

tetramer association rate and tetramer half-life compared with wild-type HLA-A*0201 tetramers[23] (Fig. 5a,b). Furthermore, the shift in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) using weakly binding pMHCI variants was substantially reduced using CD8-null tetramers compared with wild-type reagents (Fig. 5c,d). These data show that, although the interaction is weak, pMHCI–CD8 binding has an important role in stabilizing the TCR–pMHCI complex at the cell surface. In support of this notion, two-dimensional binding affinity measurements have shown that the TCR and CD8 bind pMHCI co-operatively to modulate T-cell antigen discrimination.[69] Disrupting the pMHCI–CD8 interaction clearly impacts the ability of T cells to recognize antigen.