11) Multiple swallows were observed for 32% of patients and spon

11). Multiple swallows were observed for 32% of patients and spontaneous UES relaxation for 24% (no difference between the 3 subtypes). EGJ resting and relaxation pressures did not differ between the 3 subtypes and UES pressure was as well similar

in the 3 groups. Mean overall length of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and abdominal LES length did not differ between the 3 subtypes. Conclusion: Type II is more common in untreated Chinese achalasia patients. Large-sample multicenter trials are necessary INK 128 in vivo in the future. Key Word(s): 1. Achalasia; 2. Dysphagia; 3. Esophageal manometry; Presenting Author: KUILIANG LIU Additional Authors: XIANGCHUN LIN, JING WU, HONG LIU, MINGMING MENG, HUI SU, WEIPING TAI Corresponding Author: XIANGCHUN LIN Affiliations: Beijing Shijitan Hospital Objective: Gastrointestinal duplication cysts are

rare congenital abnormalities. Malignant transformation of gastrointestinal duplications is thought to be rare. Methods: Here we report a case of gastric duplication with peritoneal metastatic adenocarcinoma. We recommend to raise the awareness of the malignant potential in adult patients with gastrointestinal duplication cysts and treat them as malignant tumor Results: Case description: A 28-year-old male presented to his routine health GW 572016 screening when abdominal sonography and subsequent computed tomography (CT) revealed a cystic lesion with no contrast-enhancement. A 10 x 10 cm cystic adherent to gastric corpus was found during the following laparoscopic surgery, howerver, attempt to remove the lesion pentoxifylline en bloc was unsuccessful, with ruptured cyst contaminating the peritonel cavity. The microscopic examination confirmed the diagnosis of gastric duplication. Seven months after

that, the patient suffered progressively increasing ascites, repeated cytologic analysis of which revealed small nests of adenocarcinoma cells, with primary unknown. A diagnostic laparoscopy showed multiple white nodules scattered over the surface of liver, greater omentum and peritoneum (Fig. 1). Biopsy of the omental nodules revealed adenocarcinoma (Fig. 2), with immunohistochemical staining of cytokeratin 20 (CK 20), CK 7 and P53 all positive, and the peritoneal carcinomatosis was diagnosed. Conclusion: Based on the clinical presentation and chronology, the malignancy is likely from gastric duplication cyst. This case highlights the importance of accurate preoperative diagnosis and optimal surgical management for gastric duplication, as well as the consideration of malignant transformation during surgical evaluation of adult patients with gastric duplication cysts. Key Word(s): 1. gastric duplication; 2. malignancy; 3.

Comments are closed.