He had made frequent business trips to Indonesia during the previous year without antimalarial prophylaxis and had no prior episodes of malaria. He returned to Singapore on May 17, 2008, developed fever on June 2, 2008 and was admitted on June 5, 2008. His blood film from clinic showed P. vivax with 0.28% parasitemia. He was initially hypotensive, requiring intravenous fluid resuscitation. Physical and laboratory examination was otherwise unremarkable; admission blood Napabucasin solubility dmso cultures were negative. He was treated with chloroquine, and primaquine

was added after 36 hours when his glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) tested normal. His fever resolved within 3 days and malaria blood films cleared after 5 days. He was discharged on June 11, 2008 and he completed a 14-day course of primaquine at 30 mg per day. His fever recurred 30 days later

on July 5, 2008. He was re-admitted on July 7, 2008 when a malaria blood film showed P. vivax with 0.2% parasitemia. He had been compliant with primaquine treatment and there was no travel between his June and July admissions in Singapore. He was initially re-treated with chloroquine. However, further questioning revealed that he worked as a timber merchant and his travel included trips to Kalimantan and Indonesian Papua. Given concern about his clinical relapse Cetuximab datasheet and CRPV, he was treated with mefloquine instead (750 mg followed by 500 mg, 12 h later). His fever resolved in 2 days and malaria blood films cleared in 3 days (Figure 1). He was discharged with instructions to complete a second course of primaquine at 30 mg per day for 14 days. The patient remained well at follow-up a month later without any further relapses. For many years after its introduction in 1946, chloroquine was considered first-line treatment for P. falciparum and P. vivax. As P. falciparum resistance to chloroquine became widespread, the use of chloroquine for treatment and prophylaxis has declined except in defined geographic areas such as Central

America and the Middle East.4 In contrast, CRPV had been relatively rare but is increasingly reported from the Americas, Asia, and Oceania.6 Epidemiological data on the geographic extent of CRPV is probably not exhaustive due to technical limitations in confirming chloroquine resistance. Although autochthonous malaria does Tideglusib not currently occur in Jakarta, Indonesia, data on imported malaria cases seen in Jakarta indicate that Indonesian Papua was among the most frequent destinations cited by civilian cases seen in Jakarta.7 Awareness of the patient’s travel to Kalimantan and Indonesian Papua6 for his timber business was critical in recognizing possible CRPV. Definitive proof of CRPV would require demonstration of P. vivax parasitemia in the presence of plasma chloroquine levels above 10 ng/mL.6 This assay is not widely available or commonly used in clinical care.